criticism of this post is to test the selectivity of access to university, and its aftershocks PAAU a smaller scale in high school. PAAU were originally designed to establish a filter that would filter academic maturity which students were better able to gain access to the public university places. Later, it became, without being a political purpose, in a filter that determined which students had access to certain careers based on an independent cut-off mark for each race.
of all, this system seems fair, impervious to corruption. Perhaps it is only fair to have this system. It's certainly not the only fair system that pudincreasing as it approaches the tool that was awarded as a child.
There are other conditions that alienate the concept of learning from these tests:
-
Nerves - The ability to memorize each student
- The "I let my partner last week / my dad died yesterday "
- Measuring the academic maturity of a person in a number of 1 to 10 with decimals.
Most frustrating of all is that a student can pass this test, start a career for a year or two, and finally realize that does not care what he is studying, to get final result (apart from the frustration of nor to focus their intellectual capacity) 3 or 4 years of his life when he has sweated and has not achieved anything.
Then there is the question of whether a teenager (ACOT here to the general rule) is mature enough to evaluate that college is willing to go through that obstacle course.
Notes on this problem abroad:
- In Italy, the exams are always oral (fear)
- Inxample, the art and design students prepare a "portfolio" to work in the area who come to study in college (design or art work). This leads to the ideal prototype motivated student. It would be interesting to see if in the process of preparing the individual student and find if their vocation is authentic or not. (Very rebién)
